Ex parte FIORDALICE et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0178                                                        
          Application No. 08/254,854                                                  


          The invention pertains to a semiconductor device                            
          having an intermetallic region.  More particularly, the                     
          intermetallic region includes a titanium-aluminum compound and              
          contains no elemental (unreacted) titanium.                                 
          Representative claim 24 is reproduced as follows:                           
               24.       A semiconductor device comprising:                           
               a substrate;                                                           
               a patterned first metal layer overlying the substrate,                 
          wherein the patterned first metal layer includes aluminum;                  
               an insulating layer including an opening that overlies                 
          the patterned first metal layer;                                            
               a via structure that lies adjacent to the patterned first              
          metal layer and lies at least partially within the opening,                 
          wherein:                                                                    
               the via structure includes a titanium-aluminum compound;               
          and                                                                         
               the via structure does not include a layer of elemental                
          titanium; and                                                               
               a patterned second metal layer overlying the via                       
          structure.                                                                  

          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Fujii et al. (Fujii)        5,312,775         May. 17, 1994                 
          (effective filing date Jan. 21, 1992)                                       
          Claims 24 and 26-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                        
          112, second paragraph, for failing to particularly point out                
          and distinctly claim the invention.  Claims 24 and 26-30 also               
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as being anticipated                
          by the disclosure of Fujii.                                                 
                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007