Ex parte WATTS - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                       Paper No. 14                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                           Ex parte LAVAUGHN F. WATTS, JR.                            
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1998-0526                                  
                               Application 08/395,335                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 24-69, which                        
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  An                 
          amendment after final rejection was filed on June 23, 1997 and              
          was entered by the examiner.                                                
                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007