Ex parte WATTS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0526                                                        
          Application 08/395,335                                                      


          The disclosed invention pertains to a clock manager                         
          for a central processing unit (CPU).  More particularly, the                
          invention adjusts the clock signal being sent to the CPU based              
          on the activity of the CPU and the temperature of the CPU.                  
          Representative claim 24 is reproduced as follows:                           
               24. An apparatus, comprising:                                          
               a central processing unit (CPU);                                       
               a monitor for measuring the relative amount of idle time               
          within and temperature associated with said CPU; and                        
               a clock manager coupled to said monitor, said clock                    
          manager selectively modifying a clock signal being sent to                  
          said CPU to optimize the utilization percentage of said CPU.                
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Georgiou et al. (Georgiou)      5,189,314        Feb. 23, 1993              
                                                                                     
          Claims 24-45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                        
          as being anticipated by the disclosure of Georgiou.  Claims                 
          46-69 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                         
          unpatentable over the teachings of Georgiou and the common                  
          knowledge in the art.  The rejection of some of the claims                  
          under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 has been                      
          withdrawn in view of the amendment after final rejection noted              
          above [answer, page 2].                                                     

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007