Ex parte WATTS - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1998-0526                                                        
          Application 08/395,335                                                      


          applied prior art results in a failure to properly establish a              
          prima facie case                                                            
          of obviousness.  As noted above, the failure to make the prima              
          facie case of obviousness by the examiner must result in a                  
          reversal of the rejection made under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                       
          We also note that the examiner’s reliance on “common                        
          knowledge in the art” is not a sufficient basis to support the              
          obviousness rejection of each of the dependent claims.  We                  
          agree with appellant that where the level of such common                    
          knowledge is being contested, the examiner has the burden to                
          provide evidence in the record to support the examiner’s                    
          conclusion of obviousness.  Such evidence is lacking in this                
          record.                                                                     











          In conclusion we have not sustained either of the                           
          examiner’s rejections of the claims.  Therefore, the decision               
                                         -9-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007