Ex parte GILPATRICK - Page 11




                 Appeal No. 1998-2551                                                                                    Page 11                        
                 Application No. 08/787,624                                                                                                             


                 suitable manner (e.g., stitches 17).   Altman teaches that the   3                                                                     
                 thread-like strip material 16 can be a looped thread formed of                                                                         
                 fine nylon or any other type so long as it is a loosely woven                                                                          
                 or knotted material                                                                                                                    
                 having loop elements or the like to firmly engage hooks 14.                                               4                            
                 Lastly, Altman's claim 1 recites that the cover has at least                                                                           
                 one strip of material.                                                                                                                 


                          The teachings of the conventional art as exemplified by                                                                       
                 Eschenbach have been set forth above.                                   In summary, Eschenbach                                         
                 discloses a core and effect yarn 16 having loops 53.5                                                                                  


                          After the scope and content of the prior art are                                                                              
                 determined, the differences between the prior art and the                                                                              
                 claims at issue are to be ascertained.  Graham v. John Deere                                                                           
                 Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966).                                                                                      




                          3See column 2, lines 1-12.                                                                                                    
                          4See column 2, lines 16-23, and 34-37.                                                                                        
                          5See Figure 3.                                                                                                                







Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007