Ex parte KOIFMAN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2874                                                        
          Application No. 08/568,718                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  A noise cancellation circuit for use with a digital                
          signal, comprising:                                                         
          a plurality of equally weighted cells for receiving                         
                    the digital signal and for providing an analogue                  
          output signal in dependence upon the value of the                           
          received digital signal; and switching means                                
          for                   dynamically switching a number of the                 
          plurality                                                                   
               of cells according to a sequencing scheme, wherein                     
          the sequencing scheme comprises a first sequence                            
          arranged to switch each of the plurality of cells                           
          in a sequential order an equal number of times, and                         
          a second sequence arranged to randomly define, using                        
          a random number generator, one of the plurality of                          
          cells as a starting position for the first sequence,                        
          such that low frequency tone generation within the                          
          analogue output signal is substantially                                     
          eliminated.                                                                 
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          van de Plassche               3,982,172                Sep. 21,             
          1976                                                                        
          van de Plassche               4,125,803                Nov. 14,             
          1978                                                                        
          Jackson                       5,221,926                Jun. 22,             
          1993                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 10 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as being unpatentable over the admitted prior art or                  
          either of the van de Plassche patents in view of Jackson.                   
               Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the                  

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007