Ex parte PELL et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1999-0069                                                        
          Application No. 08/388,741                                                  

          1, we find ourselves unable to sustain the rejection of claim               
          14 and claims 15-18, which depend therefrom.                                
               Inasmuch as the teachings of King do not alleviate the                 
          problem discussed above with regard to Glover, Eastep, Wood                 
          and Kindred, we also will not sustain the rejection of claims               
          9-12, which depend from claim 1.                                            



























                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007