Ex parte HSU - Page 2




               Appeal No. 1999-0700                                                                          Page 2                 
               Application No. 08/590,580                                                                                           


                                                        BACKGROUND                                                                  
                       The appellant's invention relates to a process for the preparation of absorbent materials                    
               from recycled fiber sludge, an absorbent material prepared by the process and a method of                            
               absorbing using the absorbent material.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from                       
               a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                              
                       The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                     
               claims are:                                                                                                          
               Kok                                            4,374,794                      Feb. 22, 1983                          
               Fleischer et al. (Fleischer)                   4,621,011                      Nov.  4, 1986                          
               Clements Jr. et al. (Clements)                 5,085,175                      Feb.   4, 1992                         
                       Additional references of record relied upon by this panel of the Board are:                                  
               Lowe et al. (Lowe)                             4,721,059                      Jan.  26, 19881                        
               Knapick et al. (Knapick)                       WO 95/07384                    Mar. 16, 19952                         
                       (published international application)                                                                        

                       The following rejections are before us for review.                                                           
               1.      Claims 19-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being                                
               indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which                       
               appellant regards as the invention.                                                                                  


                       1A copy of this reference was cited by the appellant in Paper No. 2 and a copy is of record in the           
               application file.                                                                                                    
                       2A copy of this reference was cited by the appellant in Paper No. 7 and a copy is of record in the           
               application file.                                                                                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007