Ex parte CASHMAN - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2000-0002                                                        
          Application 08/848,477                                                      

          Nevertheless, as appellant properly observes at page 8 of his               
          brief, we do not have the authority to resolve the examiner's               
          objection.                                                                  
               Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 the Board of Patent Appeals                
          and Interferences has authority to review rejections of the                 
          claims of an applicant for patent. A refusal to grant claims                
          to an applicant for patent based on a substantive reason under              
          the statute is a rejection of a claim as contrasted with an                 
          examiner's refusal to grant a claim based on a formal                       
          objection to the claims or application, which is an objection.              
          As also correctly noted by appellant in his brief, appellant's              
          recourse to the examiner's objection, was by way of a petition              
          under 37 C.F.R. 1.181(a)((1) not by an appeal under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 134. Accordingly, we do not have authority to reach the                   
          issue of the propriety of the examiner's objection.                         







                                       OPINION                                        
               The claims before us are so-called "product-by-process"                

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007