Ex Parte BAHOUT et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                                Paper No. 21             
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                                              ____________                                               
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                              ____________                                               
                           Ex parte YVON BAHOUT and FRANCOIS TAILLIET                                    
                                              ____________                                               
                                         Appeal No. 1997-2984                                            
                                     Application No. 08/259,967                                          
                                              ____________                                               
                                                ON BRIEF                                                 
                                              ____________                                               
            Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
            BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  The examiner rejected the appellants’ claims 26-28.  They                              
            appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                      

                                              BACKGROUND                                                 
                  The invention at issue in this appeal relates to computer                              
            buses.  A computer bus comprises specialized lines.  Some lines                              
            convey functional signals such as control, address, data, and                                
            clock signals.  Two of the other lines supply voltage signals.                               
            For example, buses that conform to the I2C standard comprise an                              
            "SDA" line for the transmission of control, address, and data                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007