Ex parte DEACON et al. - Page 19




          Appeal No. 1998-0210                                                        
          Application No. 08/149,193                                                  


          44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d               
          1475, 1478-79, 31 USPQ2d 1671, 1673 (Fed. Cir. 1994); In re                 
          Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 708, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1657 (Fed. Cir.                   
          1990); and RCA                                                              
          Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444,              
          221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                         


               Claim 134 is drawn to a removable golf shoe cleat for use              
          in a golf shoe having a sole, said sole having a plurality of               
          sole attachment means for attachment of removable cleats, said              
          removable golf shoe cleat comprising, inter alia, a plurality               
          of ribs on an opposing lower surface of a substantially                     
          circular flange, with the ribs providing traction against                   
          turf.                                                                       


               In understanding the meaning of the term “ribs” used by                
          appellants in claim 134, we refer to the underlying                         
          specification (page 6) which provides an explicit definition                
          thereof, as follows:                                                        




                                         19                                           





Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007