THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte JEONG JE-CHANG, and MUN HEN-HEE
__________________
Appeal No. 1998-1339
Application 08/024,3051
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before LEE, GARDNER-LANE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and
8-17. Claim 6 has been allowed, and claims 3 and 7 have been
canceled. The real party in interest is Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd.
References relied on by the Examiner
Gharavi 4,821,119 Apr. 11,
1989
1
Application for patent filed March 1, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007