Ex Parte SCHAEFFER et al - Page 8




             Appeal No. 1998-2409                                                                                 
             Application 08/398,259                                                                               


             reasonably appears to be met by Moroishi’s teaching that Ca, Mg,                                     
             etc. can be present in the melt such that they combine with                                          
             sulfur to eliminate the adverse effects of free sulfur (col. 3,                                      
             lines 48-58; col. 6, lines 47-51).  The requirement in claim 4                                       
             that a scavenger element is reacted with free sulfur to reduce                                       
             the free sulfur content to 1 ppm, the requirement in claim 5 that                                    
             the scavenger is yttrium, hafnium or zirconium, and the                                              
             requirement in claim 6 that the substrate is processed to reduce                                     
             the free sulfur content to less than about 1 ppm, would have been                                    
             fairly suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art by                                              
             Moroishi’s teaching that Ca, Mg, rare earth or Y can be added to                                     
             form stable sulfur compounds from free sulfur, thereby                                               
             eliminating the undesirable effects of free sulfur (col. 3, lines                                    
             16-66; col. 6, lines 47-55).                                                                         
                    For the above reasons we conclude, based upon the                                             
             preponderance of the evidence, that the invention recited in                                         
             appellants’ claims 1, 3-6, 14 and 16 would have been obvious to                                      
             one of ordinary skill in the art within the meaning of 35 U.S.C.                                     
             § 103.  Accordingly, we affirm the rejection over Moroishi in                                        
             view of McGill of these claims and claims 9-13, 15, 18 and 20                                        
             which each stand or fall with one of independent claims 1, 14                                        
             and 16 (brief, page 10).                                                                             

                                                      -8-8                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007