Ex parte ANDREWS - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                  Paper No. 9         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte JOHN R. ANDREWS                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-2463                                 
                              Application No. 08/598,854                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and LEVY, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-11, which are all                
          of the claims pending in this application.                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant’s invention relates to facet tracking using              
          wavelength variations and a dispersive element.  An                         
          understanding                                                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007