Ex parte ANJUM et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-2925                                                        
          Application 08/532,861                                                      


          implanting indium into the source and drain regions to a                    
          concentration peak density at a third depth relative to the                 
          upper surface of said substrate; and                                        
               implanting p-type dopant into the conductive gate via the              
          exposed surface to a concentration peak density at a second                 
          depth relative to the upper surface of said conductive gate                 
          wherein the second depth is shallower than said first depth.                
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Mitsui et al. (Mitsui)             5,296,401      Mar. 22,                  
          1994                                                                        
          Yoshizumi et al. (Yoshizumi)       5,328,864      Jul. 12,                  
          1994                                                                        
          C-M. Lin et al. (Lin), “Sub-100-nm p -n shallow junctions+                                       
          fabricated by group III dual ion implantation and rapid                     
          thermal annealing”, 54 Appl. Phys. Lett. 1790-92 (1989).                    
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1-7, 11 and 13-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 over Yoshizumi or Mitsui, in view of Lin.                             
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the rejections of claims 1-7 and affirm the                 
          rejections of claims 11 and 13-18.  We denominate the                       
          affirmances as involving new grounds of rejection under 37 CFR              
          § 1.196(b).                                                                 
               Appellants state that the claims stand or fall in two                  
          groups: 1) claims 1-7, and 2) claims 11 and 13-18 (brief,                   


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007