Ex parte NAKAMURA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1999-0778                                                        
          Application No. 08/710,685                                                  


          denominate this affirmance as involving a new ground of                     
          rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                          
                                      DECISION                                        
               The rejection of claims 18-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over               
          WO ‘238 is affirmed.  This affirmance is denominated as                     
          involving a new ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final              
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR                                                                      
          § 1.196(b) provides, "[a] new ground of rejection shall not be              
          considered final for purposes of judicial review."                          
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37                 
          CFR § 1.197© as to the rejected claims:                                     
               (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                             
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner . . . .                   
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007