Ex parte MIKI - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                          
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                           

                                                                                      Paper No. 25                        
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                      __________                                                          
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                Ex parte ATSUSHI MIKI                                                     
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No. 1999-1463                                                      
                                                Application 08/467,052                                                    
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                      __________                                                          
              Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
              THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-                 
              4, which constitute all the claims in the application.                                                      
                     Claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                                         
                     1.  A semiconductor laser module, comprising:                                                        
                     a meta  casing of said semiconductor laser module;                                                   
                     a semiconductor laser; and                                                                           


                                                            1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007