Ex parte WRISTERS et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             
                                                            Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                     Ex parte DERICK J. WRISTERS, ROBERT DAWSON,                      
                        H. JIM FULFORD, JR., MARK I. GARDNER,                         
                      FREDERICK N. HAUSE, MARK W. MICHAEL, and                        
                                  BRADLEY T. MOORE                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-1517                                  
                             Application No. 08/837,523                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before BARRETT, LALL, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges               
          LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the Examiner's final rejection  of claims 1 through 30.1                                             
          Claims 31 through 35 have been canceled.                                    



               An amendment after final rejection was filed as paper no. 9, however1                                                                     
          its entry was refused by the examiner (see paper no. 10).                   
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007