The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law journal
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte HEIDI PETERSON and JUNGWOO LEE
Appeal No. 2000-1499
Application No. 08/825,474
ON BRIEF
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-4, 6-9, 11-14, and 16-18.1 Claims 5, 10 and 15 have
1We note that the examiner has not included claims 13 and 17
in any statement of rejection nor has the examiner indicated
these claims to be allowable. We treat them as being rejected
under 35 U.S.C. 103 since appellants consider them to be rejected
and the examiner apparently is treating them as being rejected
since the examiner responds to appellants’ arguments in this
regard.
-1–
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007