Ex Parte WALL et al - Page 10


         Appeal No. 2001-0130                                                       
         Application No. 09/050,491                                                 

         metallization; (b) completely embedding the chip in a pre-mixed            
         pack of 30% by weight of Ni powder, 3% by weight of NH4I, and the          
         balance alumina powder4 in a cylindrical workboat; (c) heating             
         the chip to 850°C for one hour in a flowing stream of argon                
         maintained at 2 SCFH; (d) cooling the workboat to about 50°C;              
         (e) removing the chip carrier from the pack; (f) cleaning the              
         chip carrier in flowing distilled water at room temperature; and           
         (g) cleaning the chip carrier ultrasonically in alcohol.                   
         (Example 1.)                                                               
              The examiner’s position is succinctly stated as follows               
         (answer, page 5):                                                          
              The inert alumina filler is an inert material in                      
              contact with the receiving metal.  At least some of                   
              the alumina will physically separate some of the                      
              receiving metal and nickel.  As it is disclosed in the                
              examples that the deposited nickel coating is uniform                 
              and essentially pore free, the alumina filler is                      
              clearly in “floating contact” with the receiving metal                
              surface, given appellants’ definition for floating                    
              contact at page 10, line 16 to page 11, line 6 of                     
              their specification...                                                
              We are in complete agreement with the examiner’s analysis.            
         On this point, we note that 67% by weight of the “pre-mixed                
         pack” described in Example 1 of Park ‘095 is alumina, one of the           
         appellants’ preferred inert materials.  Thus, it was reasonable            
                                                                                   
              4  The specification enlightens one skilled in the relevant           
         art that alumina is a preferred “inert material.”  (P. 8, ll.              
         20-23.)                                                                    
                                         10                                         


Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007