Ex Parte GATES et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2351                                                        
          Application No. 08/772,443                                                  


          1.  A disk array controller, comprising:                                    
          a peripheral interface control regulating data transfers                    
          from a peripheral to a bus;                                                 
          a data buffer control regulating data transfers from the bus                
          to a data buffer;                                                           
          a host interface control regulating data transfers from the                 
          bus to a host system; and                                                   
          a snooping circuit, wherein the snooping circuit monitors                   
          the bus for data transfers from the bus to the data buffer and              
          determines if a current data transfer on the bus matches a                  
          requested data transfer,                                                    
          wherein, in response to a determination that the current                    
          data transfer on the bus matches a requested data transfer, the             
          host interface control initiates a transfer of data that is part            
          of the current data transfer from the bus to the host system                
          without requiring transfer of the data using the data buffer.               

          The reference relied upon by the examiner is:                               
          Parks et al. (Parks)             5,623,700         Apr. 22, 1997            
          (filed Apr. 06, 1994)                                                       

          Claims 1, 3, 4, 9, 11, 12, 17-23, 26 and 31-34 stand                        
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Parks.                  
          The respective positions of the examiner and the appellants                 
          with regard to the propriety of these rejections are set forth in           
          the final rejection and the examiner’s substituted answer (Paper            
          Nos. 17 and 29, respectively) and the appellants’ amended brief             
          and reply brief (Paper Nos. 23 and 25, respectively).                       
                                                                                     

                                         -2–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007