Ex Parte HUH et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 34              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte YUN JUN HUH,                                  
                                    SUK BIN HAN,                                      
                                        and                                           
                                    JAE JEONG KIM                                     
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-1674                                  
                             Application No. 08/923,949                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                     ON BRIEF                                         
                                   _______________                                    
          Before PAK, LIEBERMAN, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from             
          the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 5, 15, 17 and 19.                 
          Claim 5 was amended subsequent to the final Office action dated             
          June 9, 1998.  Claims 6 through 14, the remaining claims in the             
          above-identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration            
          by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention.               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007