Ex Parte HUH et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 1999-1674                                                        
          Application No. 08/923,949                                                  

               15.  A semiconductor wafer cleaning apparatus                          
               comprising:                                                            
                    a cleaning environment having a wafer carrier; and                
                   a plurality of jetting means for jetting a liquid                 
               against a wafer within said cleaning environment, each said            
               jetting means including a plurality of jet nozzle holes,               
               wherein a first of the plurality of jetting means is located           
               at a bottom center of the cleaning tank with the plurality             
               of jet nozzle holes facing upward and a second of the                  
               plurality of jetting means is located at both sides of the             
               cleaning tank with the plurality of jet nozzle holes facing            
               a center of the wafer carrier at an oblique angle, wherein             
               said liquid is directly sprayed from said jetting means onto           
               left, right, and bottom sides of the wafer.                            
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Seiichiro                     4,753,258           Jun. 28, 1988             
          Hayami et al. (Hayami)        5,474,616           Dec. 12, 1995             
          Ando                          5-182946            Jul. 23, 1993             
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)                                     
               Claims 1, 5, 15, 17 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Seiichiro,           
          Ando, and Hayami.                                                           
               We reverse the aforementioned Section 103 rejection for the            
          reasons set forth in the Brief and the Reply Brief.  We add the             
          following primarily for emphasis.                                           
               As evidence of obviousness of the claimed subject matter               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner relies on the combined                  
          teachings of Seiichiro, Hayami, and Ando.  The examiner finds               
          that Seiichiro teaches “a wafer cleaning apparatus comprising a             
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007