The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENNETH M. SKULINA, RICHARD M. BIONTA,
DANIEL M. MAKOWIECKI and CRAIG S. ALFORD
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1873
Application No. 08/762,572
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 13, 15 to 19,
21, 22 and 24 to 32, as amended subsequent to the final rejection.1
We REVERSE and REMAND.
1 While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final rejection (Paper No. 9, filed
June 9, 1998), we note that this amendment has not been clerically entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007