Ex Parte SKULINA et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 1999-1873                                                               Page 2                
             Application No. 08/762,572                                                                               


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                          
                    The appellants' invention relates to a process for fabricating beryllium-based                    
             multilayer x-ray mirrors useful in the wavelength region greater than the beryllium K-                   
             edge (11.1nm) (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the              
             appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                                       


                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                   
             appealed claims are:                                                                                     
             Shinohara                                 4,380,211                   Apr. 19, 1983                      
             Snyder                                    4,591,418                   May 27, 1986                       
             Suzuki et al. (Suzuki)                    5,153,898                   Oct. 6, 1992                       
             Itou et al. (Itou)                        5,272,744                   Dec. 21, 1993                      
             Fukuda et al. (Fukuda)                    5,310,603                   May 10, 1994                       
             Tennant et al. (Tennant)                  5,521,031                   May 28, 1996                       
             Asakawa et al. (Asakawa)                  JP 62-56568                 Mar. 12, 1987                      
             Nagata                                    JP 63-32849                 Feb. 12, 19882                     



                    Claims 13, 15 to 19, 21, 22 and 24 to 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                     
             as being unpatentable over either Fukuda, Itou, Suzuki or Tennant in view of Snyder                      
             and either Nagata, Asakawa or Shinohara.                                                                 



                    2 In determining the teachings of Nagata and Asakawa, we will rely on the translations provided by
             the USPTO.  A copy of the translations are attached for the appellants' convenience.                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007