Ex Parte CROS et al - Page 2


              Appeal No. 2001-0499                                                     Page 2                       
              Application No. 08/945,731                                                                               

                     (a) providing an adsorption reagent comprising a sol consisting of an aqueous                     
              continuous phase and a discontinuous phase of the particulate support, which                             
              comprises a functionalized, particulate polymer, said polymer being obtained by                          
              polymerization of (1) a first water-soluble monomer of acrylamide or of an acrylamide                    
              derivative, (2) at least one cross-linking agent and (3) at least a second cationic and                  
              water-soluble functional monomer, said polymer having a predetermined lower critical                     
              solubility temperature (LCST) which is between 25 and 450C,                                              
                     (b) bringing into contact the adsorption reagent with the sample containing the                   
              nucleic material to absorb the nucleic material to the particulate support,                              
                     wherein, in said contacting step (b), the reaction medium has:                                    
                     - an ionic strength at most equal to 10 -2 M,                                                     
                     - a pH at most equal to 7, and                                                                    
                     - a temperature less than the LCST of the polymer,                                                
                     (c) optionally observing that the adsorption has taken place, and                                 
                     (d) separating the discontinuous phase from the continuous phase.                                 

              The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                          
              Hoffman et al. (Hoffman)                  5,912,032                 Mar. 27, 1990                       
              Kausch et al. (Kausch)                   5,508,164                 Apr. 16, 1996                       
              Kawaguchi et al. (Kawaguchi)              5,122,600                 Jun. 16, 1992                       
              Itoh et al. (Itoh)                       EP 161,881                 Nov. 21, 1985                       
                     Claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                      
              As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Itoh, Hoffman, Kausch, and                          
              Kawaguchi.                                                                                               
                                                     VACATUR                                                           
                     We begin with the proposition that this board serves as a board of review, not as                 
              a de novo examination tribunal.  35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  Review of the examiner’s position in                 
              this appeal is difficult since the examiner has not applied the teachings of the cited prior             
              art against the requirements of any individual claim on appeal.                                          
                     At page 4 of the Examiner’s Answer, the examiner refers the reader to Paper No.                   
              10 for a statement of the rejection.  Paper No. 10 is an Advisory Action entered on                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007