Ex Parte QIAN et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1312                                                        
          Application No. 08/989,701                                                  


          fitting the model using both frequency and phase measurements.              
          According to Appellants (specification, page 4), the use of a               
          quadratic phase model reduces the computation requirements of the           
          conventionally used cubic phase interpolation algorithm.                    
               Claim 2 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
                    2.  A method for synthesizing music and/or speech sound           
               signals using sinusoidal modeling, comprising the steps of:            
                    measuring frequency and phase values at frame                     
               boundaries t = ti and t = ti+1 (O < i < N) for N data frames           
               of interval length T of a sampled signal;                              
                    modeling phase and frequency functions for the ith                
               data frame using a quadratic phase model 2i(J)=ai+biJ+ciJ2,            
               Ti(J)=bi+2ciJ, where J = t - ti;                                       
                    determining polynomial coefficients ai, bi, ci assuming           
               unwrapped phase and frequency are continuous at frame                  
               boundaries, and determining unknowns by minimizing a square            
               error function; and                                                    
                    synthesizing said music and/or speech sound signals               
               from said model and coefficients.                                      
               As the sole rejection by the Examiner before us, claims 2-8            
          stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as           
          being based on an inadequate disclosure.                                    






                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007