Appeal No. 2001-1312
Application No. 08/989,701
of synthesizing speech or music signals from a developed
sinusoidal model, we fail to see how Appellants’ disclosure would
not be enabling, and the Examiner provides no basis for
concluding otherwise.
In view of the above, we find that the Examiner has not
established a reasonable basis for challenging the sufficiency of
the instant disclosure. While some experimentation by artisans
may be necessary in order to practice the invention, we find that
such experimentation would not be undue. Accordingly, we will
not sustain the rejection of claims 2-8 under the first paragraph
of 35 U.S.C. § 112, and the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims
2-8 is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007