Ex Parte ALONSO - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2001-1485                                                        
          Application No. 08/532,211                                                  
          followed by removal of the inactivating agents and further                  
          optional processing of the product.  (Id., page 5, line 19 – page           
          6, line 7).                                                                 
               The examiner has additionally found that Mitra teaches the             
          need to produce virus-free ISG to prevent viral infection in                
          patients.  Mitra also recognizes the historic need to reduce the            
          ACA to obtain safe ISG.  (Id., page 6, lines 8-14).                         
               The examiner has further found that Joy Yang discloses an ISG          
          with a deliberate virus inactivation step followed by retention of          
          complement activity.  (Id., page 6, line 15 – page 7, line 8).              
               The examiner thus concludes that it would have been obvious            
          to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was made to              
          modify Tenold to pretreat for viral reduction as taught by                  
          Neurath, Mitra, and Joy Yang to both ensure reduction of viruses            
          and low ACA.  (Id., page 7, lines 6-11).  As to the incubation              
          step of Claim 1(b), the examiner explains that the “antibody                
          solution [of Tenold] is stored for up to six months under the               
          defined controlled parameters,” citing Tenold, column 4, line 24 –          
          column 8, line 54).                                                         
               The appellant, on the other hand, asserts that there is no             
          suggestion or motivation to require a step (b) which reduces the            
          increased ACA level as no one was aware of the “surprising”                 
          increase.  Consequently, no one could have expected the increased           
          ACA level, much less found a way to counter it.  (Appeal Brief,             

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007