Ex Parte LAUFER et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2002-0035                                                        
          Application No. 08/861,918                                                  


               portions 14 and 16, together with the flexible membrane                
               18 between the seals 19, seal the immersion chambers 12                
               from the ambient environment external of the sealed                    
               cryogenic vessel 10, thereby containing a cryogenic                    
               liquid 42 in the immersion chambers 12 and preventing                  
               frost formation.                                                       
                    The flexible membrane 18 may be a commercially                    
               available flex-circuit made of material which does not                 
               become rigid at cryogenic temperatures such as, for                    
               instance, a polyimide or Teflon material.                              
               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               
          reference discloses, either expressly or under the principles of            
          inherency, each and every element of a claimed invention.  RCA              
          Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444,              
          221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  It is not necessary that the           
          reference teach what the subject application teaches, but only              
          that the claim read on something disclosed in the reference,                
          i.e., that all of the limitations of the claim be found in or               
          fully met by the reference.  Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 713            
          F.2d 760, 772, 218 USPQ 781, 789 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied,            
          465 U.S. 1026 (1984).                                                       
               Appellants contend (supplemental brief, page 11) that Porter           
               does not teach the new features of [the] present                       
               invention which are now defined in claims 44 and 45 but                
               instead teaches a structure which is different,                        
               operates in a different manner, and does not have a                    
               conductor track formed as a bendable carrier film which                


                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007