Ex Parte YAMANOI et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-1594                                                                                      
              Application No. 09/057,573                                                                                

                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention is directed to qualification of signals in an optical disc apparatus, in             
              particular suppressing system response to any effects of DC component variation.                          
              Claim 7 is reproduced below.                                                                              
                     7.     An apparatus for the qualification of a signal comprising:                                  
                            a phase locked loop synchronizer, said phase locked loop synchronizer                       
                     producing phase error signals in response to an analog signal input, said phase                    
                     locked loop synchronizer further adjusting a signal slice level in response to said                
                     analog signal from a jitter feedback slicer, said jitter feedback slicer responding                
                     to said phase error signals to one of increase or decrease a voltage of said                       
                     analog signal input to compensate for a change in said signal slice level from                     
                     said jitter feedback slicer.                                                                       
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                   
              Saiki et al. (Saiki)                      5,467,331                   Nov. 14, 1995                       
              Kawashima et al. (Kawashima)              5,966,356                   Oct. 12, 1999                       
                                                                             (filed Nov.  7, 1997)                      
                     Claims 1-3 and 7-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                      
              over Kawashima and Saiki.                                                                                 
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 11) and the Examiner’s Answer                           
              (Paper No. 18) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No.                     
              16) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand rejected.                             







                                                          -2-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007