The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LOWELL D. EUBANK and ERNEST R. BOLLER
__________
Appeal No. 2003-0210
Application 03/237,574
___________
HEARD: JANUARY 23, 2003
___________
Before OWENS, JEFFREY T. SMITH and TIMM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 6-11
and 13-15, which are all of the claims in the application. In
the examiner’s answer the examiner states that claim 9 is allowed
(page 2). Hence, the claims before us are claims 1-3, 6-8, 10,
11 and 13-15.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007