Ex Parte EUBANK et al - Page 10




            Appeal No. 2003-0210                                                                       
            Application 03/237,574                                                                     


            Corson “shows it is old and advantageous in the art to add a                               
            small amount of nickel to the copper tin-alloy” (answer,                                   
            page 11).  This argument is not sufficient for establishing that                           
            the applied references themselves would have fairly suggested, to                          
            one of ordinary skill in the art, adding Corson’s components to                            
            the bronze used by Eubank for coating uranium.                                             
                  For the above reasons we conclude that the examiner has not                          
            carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of                                   
            obviousness of the article claimed in the appellants’ claim 6.                             
                                              DECISION                                                 
                  The rejections of claims 1, 7 and 15 under 35 U.S.C.                                 
            § 102(a) over Robinson, claims 1 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)                            
            over Boller, claims 1, 7 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) over                               
            Eubank, claims 1-3, 10, 11 and 13-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over                            














                                                  10                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007