The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VICTOR M. BOLZE, JONATHAN W. BROWN,
ANDREW L. KURKJIAN, TIMOTHY L. LONG, ANGUS J. MELBOURNE,
LINWARD A. MOORE, and ROBERT P. ZIMMERMAN
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0533
Application No. 09/511,183
____________
HEARD: JUNE 11, 2003
____________
Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 8, 10, 11, and 13 through 31. Claim 9 stands objected to
as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, while claim 12 has
been allowed. These claims constitute all of the claims in the
application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007