Appeal No. 2003-0533
Application No. 09/511,183
6. Claims 13 through 17, 19, and 21 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Michaels in view of
White and Dave.
7. Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Michaels in view of White and Dave, as applied
to claims 13 through 17 above, further in view of Hrametz.
8. Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Michael in view of White and Dave, as applied
to claims 13 through 16, and 19 above, further in view of Massie.
The full text of the examiner’s rejections and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer (Paper
No. 25), while the complete statement of appellants’ argument can
be found in the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 24 and 26).
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007