Appeal No. 2003-0533
Application No. 09/511,183
The following rejections are before us for review.
1. Claims 1, 2, 4 through 6, 8, 10, 22, 23, 25, 26 through 28,
and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Michaels in view of White.
2. Claims 3 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Michaels in view of White, as applied to
claims 1 and 22 above, further in view of Dave.
3. Claims 7 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Michaels in view of White, as applied to
claims 1, 6, and 10 above, further in view of Ringgenberg.
4. Claim 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Michaels in view of White and Dave, as applied
to claims 22, 25, 27, and 28 above, further in view of Hrametz.
5. Claim 31 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Michaels in view of White and Dave, as applied
to claims 22, 25, 27, and 30 above, further in view of Massie.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007