Ex Parte PARE - Page 17




             positive limitation ...... Kennecott Co1p. v. Kyocera International, Inc. 835 F-2d 1419, 1423, 5                    
             USPQ2d 1194,1198 (Fed. Cit. 1987) guoting Langer v. Kaufman 465 F.2d 915, 918,175 USPQ                              
             172, 174 (CCPA 1972) guotin Binstead v. Littmann, 242 F.2d 766, 770, 113 USPQ 279, 282                              
             (CCPA 1957). In Kennecott, 835 F.2d at 1423, 5 USPQ2d at 1198, the court noted:                                     
                            The court has generally applied this standard of the "necessary and only                             
                            reasonable construction" as a basis for determining whether an application                           
                            could, on the basis of an inherent property, support a limitation in an                              
                            interference count. [Citations omitted.]                                                             
             The "necessary and only" requirement precludes reliance on mere probabilities or possibilities. As                  
             noted by the CCPA:                                                                                                  
                            Inherency, however, may not be established by probabilities or possibilities.                        
                            The mere fact that a certain thing may result from a given set of                                    
                            circumstances is not sufficient. [Citations omitted.] If, however, the                               
                            disclosure is sufficient to show that the natural result flowing from the                            
                            operation as taught would result in the performance of the questioned                                
                            function, it seems to be well settled that the disclosure should be regarded as                      
                            sufficient.                                                                                          
             Inre0elrich,666F.2d578,581,212USPQ323,326(CCPA1981),qU "tin 11anspirgy.Kenungi,                                     
             102 F.2d 212, 214, 40 USPQ 665, 667 (CCPA 1939). Thus, it is not sufficient that a person                           
             following the disclosure might obtain the result set forth; it must inevitably hgRRen. Dreyfus v.                   
             Stemau, 357 F.2d 411,415,149 USPQ 63,66 (CCPA 1966) (emphasis added); Crome v. Morrogh,                             
             239 F.2d 390, 392, 112 USPQ 49, 50 (CCPA 1956).                                                                     
                                           2) Inherency of the Intermittent Application of Reduced                               
                                                  Pressure                                                                       
                    Par6 argues:                                                                                                 
                            Both Par6'426 or Par6'947 employ conventional microwave ovens to supply                              
                            microwave energy to release volatiles in fresh sage in a closed container                            
                            (Example 2). As is well known in the art, conventional microwave ovens                               
                            supply microwave energy in pulses (i.e., effectivity an on-off cycle that is                         
                            repeated throughout the treatment period). During the "on-cycle" of the                              
                            microwave energy, the temperatures ofboth the contents in the container and                          
                            the container itself will rise. During the "off-cycle," the temperatures will, of                    
                            course, fall since no heating energy will be supplied to the container or its                        
                            contents. One of ordinary skill in the art, using the well known ideal gas                           
                            equation (Whitten et al.), namely                                                                    

                                                           -17-                                                                  






Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007