The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANK C. GOVER, FRANK E. LEVINE, BRET R. OLSZEWSKI,
CHARLES P. ROTH, EDWARD H. WELBON, and CHARLES WRIGHT
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0288
Application No. 08/538,071
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 6, 8-11, 14-18, 20-25, 28-
31, and 33-40, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.
BACKGROUND
Appellants' invention relates to a method and system for
selecting and distinguishing an event sequence using an effective
address in a processing system. An understanding of the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007