Ex Parte BAWOLEK et al - Page 3




                Appeal No. 2003-0261                                                                                                    
                Application No. 09/126,203                                                                                              


                                                            References                                                                  
                Dillon et al (Dillon)                    U.S. Patent 4,016,597             April 5, 1997                                
                Yamakawa                U.S. Patent 5,929,432                              July 27, 1999                                
                                        (filed May 29, 1997)                                                                            
                Fontenot et al. (Fontenot)         PCT WO 96/41481                         Dec. 19, 1996                                
                Morimoto                                  JP 6[1994]-105319                April 15, 1994                               
                Sharp, Gary D. et al. (Sharp) “Progress in Field-Sequential Color Shutter Technology”                                   
                Proc. SPIE Vol. 3031, pages 107-111.                                                                                    
                                                       Rejections at Issue                                                              
                        Claims 16, 19, 25, 28 through 32, 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                      
                § 103 as being unpatentable over Fontenot in view of Yamakawa, Dillon and Morimoto.                                     
                        Claims 17, 18, 20 though 24, 26, 27, 33, 34, and 37 through 39 stands rejected                                  
                under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Fontenot in view of Yamakawa,                                          
                Dillon, Sharp et al. and Morimoto.                                                                                      
                                                              Opinion                                                                   
                       We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections                                       
                advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the                                             
                examiner as support for the rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                                     








                                                                 -3–                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007