Ex Parte BAWOLEK et al - Page 6




                Appeal No. 2003-0261                                                                                                    
                Application No. 09/126,203                                                                                              


                at 1617, citing McElmurry v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 995 F.2d 1576, 1578, 27                                        
                USPQ2d 1129, 1131 (Fed. Cir. 1993).  The Federal Circuit states that, “[t]he mere fact                                  
                that the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by the Examiner does not                                     
                make the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the desirability of the                                    
                modification.”  In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266 n.14, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783-84 n.14                                    
                (Fed. Cir. 1992), citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed.                                     
                Cir. 1984).  In addition, our reviewing court stated in Lee, 277 F.3d at 1343, 61                                       
                USPQ2d at 1433, that when making an obviousness rejection based on combination,                                         
                “there must be some motivation, suggestion or teaching of the desirability of making the                                
                specific combination that was made by Applicant” (quoting In re Dance, 160 F.3d 1339,                                   
                1343, 48 USPQ2d 1635, 1637 (Fed. Cir. 1998).                                                                            
                        The examiner asserts on page 4 of the answer that Fontenot et al. teach that the                                
                filters in the color wheel embodiment (figure 4) and the liquid crystal shutter                                         
                embodiment (figure 6) transmit light in both the visible spectrum and infrared.  On page                                
                5 of the answer the examiner further states                                                                             
                        The knowledge within the ordinary skill in the art that color pass filters of the                               
                type that Fontenot et al.describes at page 18, lines 1-11, or a liquid crystal color                                    
                shutter filter of the type that Fontenot et al. describes at page 21, line to page 22                                   
                line 5, do(es) not pass color only as asserted by Appellant but instead routinely                                       
                pass(es) infrared radiation is long-standing.  See Figs. 4, 5, and 6 of Yamakawa                                        
                which show that color pass filters include significant infrared transmission.  See                                      
                also Fig. 5 of Dillon et al. which shows that color pass filters include significant                                    
                infrared transmission.  Sharp et al. confirms that a filter of the type illustrated by                                  
                Fontenot et al. in fig. 6 would have significant transmission in the infrared even                                      
                when combined (see Figs. 4 and 5).  Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art                                       
                                                                 -6–                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007