Ex Parte GOLDBERG et al - Page 6


                 Appeal No.  2003-0837                                               Page ~ PAGE ~6~                     
                 Application No.  09/078,531                                                                             
                 aspirate?  Notwithstanding the examiner’s statement that marrow-derived human                           
                 mesenchymal stem cells inherently have a fibroblastic morphology, it has only                           
                 been demonstrated that adherent marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells                                   
                 derived from femoral head cancellous bone or iliac aspirate have a fibroblast-like                      
                 morphology.                                                                                             
                        We recognize that when an anticipatory reference is silent with regard to                        
                 an asserted inherent characteristic, the gap in the reference may be filled with by                     
                 reference to extrinsic evidence.  However, the extrinsic “evidence must make                            
                 clear that the missing descriptive matter is necessarily present in the thing                           
                 described in the reference, and that it would be so recognized by persons of                            
                 ordinary skill.”  Continental Can Co. USA Inc. v. Monsanto Co., 948 F.2d 1264,                          
                 1268, 20 USPQ2d 1746, 1749 (Fed. Cir. 1991).  The examiner appears to                                   
                 recognize (Answer, page 12), as set forth in In re Robertson, 169 F.3d 743, 745,                        
                 49 USPQ2d 1949, 1950-51 (Fed. Cir. 1999):                                                               
                                If the prior art reference does not expressly set forth a                                
                        particular element of the claim, that reference still may anticipate if                          
                        that element is “inherent” in its disclosure. To establish inherency,                            
                        the extrinsic evidence “must make clear that the missing descriptive                             
                        matter is necessarily present in the thing described in the                                      
                        reference, and that it would be so recognized by persons of                                      
                        ordinary skill.”   Continental Can Co. v. Monsanto Co., 948 F.2d                                 
                        1264, 1268, 20 U.S.P.Q.2d 1746, 1749 (Fed. Cir. 1991).                                           
                        “Inherency, however, may not be established by probabilities or                                  
                        possibilities. The mere fact that a certain thing may result from a                              
                        given set of circumstances is not sufficient.” Id. at 1269, 20                                   
                        U.S.P.Q.2d at 1749 (quoting In re Oelrich, 666 F.2d 578, 581, 212                                
                        U.S.P.Q. 323, 326 (C.C.P.A. 1981).                                                               
                        On this record, the examiner has made very specific selections from the                          
                 genus of options set forth in Grande.  In our opinion, this picking and choosing                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007