Ex Parte Kretchman et al - Page 8




          Appeal No. 2003-1775                                                        
          Application No. 09/845,925                                 Page 8           


               The portion of the second Levine declaration referred to by            
          appellants is directed to tests performed with a device (Second             
          Levine declaration, Exhibit I), which is alleged to be like the             
          CUT-N-Seal device sold by Pampered Chef.  That latter device is             
          alleged to correspond to the Tartmaster of Kaiser.  According to            
          Dr. Levine (numbered paragraph 6 of the second declaration), the            
          CUT-N-Seal-like device was employed by placing two slices of                
          bread under the unit and pressing down on a top plunger of the              
          device.  Dr. Levine (second declaration, numbered paragraph 6)              
          reports that:                                                               
               [e]ven with a high degree of pressure, the bread slices                
               were not completely cut.  However, the edge seal under                 
               the sealing ring was completely compressed so the bread                
               was molded together in a homogenous mass, as shown in                  
               Exhibit K . . . .                                                      

               In numbered paragraphs 7 through 10 of that second                     
          declaration, Dr. Levine further describes the resulting product             
          of the experiment as including an “amorphous homogenous mass” of            
          bread.  Dr. Levine concludes that the sealed sandwich depicted in           
          U.S. patent No. 6,004,5964 was not duplicated by the sandwich he            


               4 The present application was filed as a continuation of               
          application No. 09/404,701, now abandoned, which latter                     
          application was filed as a continuing (divisional) application of           
          prior application No. 08/986,581. Grandparent application No.               
          08/986,581 was issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,004,596. That patent             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007