Ex Parte Kretchman et al - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2003-1775                                                        
          Application No. 09/845,925                                 Page 9           


          made with the CUT-N-Seal-like device.  Moreover, a sandwich                 
          having the brand name “Uncrustables” was obtained by Dr. Levine             
          and found by him to have an edge seal that differed from that of            
          his CUT-N-Seal-like device prepared sandwich.  The other Levine             
          declaration referred to at page 6 of the brief is of little                 
          probative value since that declaration is not specifically                  
          directed to the present claim 39 product and the Kaiser                     
          reference.                                                                  
               The tests conducted in the second Levine declaration were              
          conducted by pushing down on the top plunger of the device used             
          in the tests without pushing down on the outer ring of a                    
          “Tartmaster.”  As is readily apparent from an inspection of the             
          construction of the Tartmaster with a plunger (such as model                
          H2001 or H2003), there are only a few ways to use the device.               
          One of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that                 
          pressing on the outside edge would have been an option that                 
          yields greater cutting force if the particular bread slices                 
          selected are difficult to cut.  In such a case, pushing the                 


          is currently undergoing reexamination (Control No. 90005948).               
          Moreover, U.S. Patent No. 6,004,596 is involved in litigation               
          (brief, page 27).  Application No. 10/314,770 was filed as a                
          continuation of application No. 09/821,137, which latter                    
          application is another related application on appeal (appeal No.            
          03-1754).                                                                   







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007