Ex Parte WOOD et al - Page 14



          Appeal No. 2004-0024                                                           
          Application No. 09/249,922                                   Page 14           

          temperatures disclosed.  It is further argued (reply brief, page               
          11) that the examiner has improperly combined the teachings of                 
          Gaus, Cockram and Graham using hindsight.                                      
               From our review of Graham, we find that Graham discloses                  
          (col. 1, lines 34-37) that halide condensation, particularly in                
          lower wattage lamps, can significantly reduce efficacy and                     
          increase color temperature to unacceptable levels.  We further                 
          find that in all three tables provide, that Graham only discloses              
          the color temperature to be 3,800/ Kelvin.  We agree with the                  
          examiner (answer, page 4) that Graham discloses (col. 6, lines                 
          53-57) that “[i]t has been determined that in using the metal                  
          halides, sodium iodide and scandium tri-iodide, the percentage by              
          weight of these additives is important in optimizing efficacy and              
          controlling color temperature of the lamp.”  From this disclosure              
          of Graham, we find that the mixture of the additives to be a                   
          result effective variable.  This accords with the general rule                 
          that discovery of an optimum value of a result effective variable              
          (in this case, the optimum color temperature) is ordinarily                    
          within the skill of the art.  See In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272,                  
          276, 205 USPQ 215, 219 (CCPA 1980) and In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454,              
          456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955).  As stated in In re Huang,                 
          100 F.3d 135, 139, 40 USPQ2d 1685, 1688 (Fed. Cir. 1996):                      





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007