Ex Parte Arafa et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2004-0550                                                        
          Application No. 09/802,201                                                  


          Appel                          5,605,861          Feb. 25, 1997             
          Rajkanan et al. (Rajkanan)     5,750,426          May 12, 1998              
          Dennen                         5,814,869          Sep. 29, 1998             
          Lee et al. (Lee)               6,103,582          Aug. 15, 2000             
          (filed Aug. 13, 1998)                                                       
          Boden, Jr. et al. (Boden)      6,165,821          Dec. 26, 2000             
          (filed Feb. 09, 1998)                                                       
          Wu et al. (Wu)                 6,232,208          May  15, 2001             
          (filed Nov. 06, 1998)                                                       
          Draper                         6,285,052          Sep. 04, 2001             
          (filed Sep. 26, 1997)                                                       
               The following rejections are before us for review in this              
          appeal:                                                                     
               (1) claims 1-3 and 6-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 103(a) as unpatentable over Rajkanan in view of Lee and Draper            
          (Answer, page 4);                                                           
               (2) claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)             
          as unpatentable over Rajkanan in view of Lee, Wu and Boden                  
          (Answer, page 6);                                                           
               (3) claims 10-13 stand rejected under section 103(a) over              
          the references as in rejection (2) further in view of Draper                
          (Answer, page 7);                                                           
               (4) claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under section 103(a)               
          over Rajkanan in view of Dennen, Appel and Draper (Answer,                  
          page 8);                                                                    




                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007