Interference 104,746 Paper 123
Stice v. Campbell
18. Campbell filed a principal brief on priority
(Paper 99), which Stice did not oppose, as Campbell noted in a
"Notice concerning filing of reply brief" (Paper 107).
Stice case for priority
Conception
19. Stice points to an entry dated "6/22/95" in a
laboratory notebook prepared by Dr. Steven L. Stice as evidence
of conception. (Paper 115 at 8.)
20. According to Stice, the critical sentence supporting
conception reads:
"Want to try electroporation on fibroblast so that they can
be used to produce nuclear transfer embryos from clonal cells.
Will talk to Jose [Cibelli] about this."
(Paper 115 at 8, citing SX 20552.)
21. Stice represents that Dr. Stice signed this page of his
laboratory notebook on 23 June 1995. (Paper 115 at 8.)
22. Stice represents further that this page was
"subsequently corroborated" by Mr. Jeffrey Kane on 30 April 1997.
23. Review of Stice exhibit SX 2055 (Stice notebook)
confirms the dates cited by Stice.
24. Exhibit 2055 is not labeled by any page numbers.
2 Stice Exhibits are cited as SX 2___; Campbell exhibits are cited as
CX 1___.
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007