Interference 104,746 Paper 123
Stice v. Campbell
25. Kane testified that he signed the notebook on the date
indicated. (SX 2052 at 1.)
26. Stice argues that "this is the first date [22 June
1995] indicating the conception by Dr. Steven Stice of a method
of using differentiated donor cells (i.e. fibroblast cells) as
donor cells for subsequent nuclear transfer experiment from which
offspring could be generated. The conception corresponds to the
subject matter of the Counts." (Paper 115 at 8–9.)
27. Stice has not, in its principal brief, directed our
attention to any expert testimony or other evidence supporting
its assertions regarding the critical sentence and its relation
to any of counts 4–6.
28. Dr. Stice testified, "[t]hat entry [SX 2055] indicates
that I wanted to try the process of electroporation on fibroblst
cells in order that they may be used to produce nuclear transfer
embryos from the cloned cells. I also indicated in my notebook
that I wanted to talk to my colleague, Dr. Jose Cibelli,
regarding developing this technology." (Stice declaration,
SX 2050 at 2–3.)
29. We find no explanation in Stice's declaration of the
relation of his sentence to the limitations of any of the Counts.
30. According to Stice, on another page of Dr. Stice's
laboratory notebook, in an entry dated 27 June 1995, Dr. Stice
-9-
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007