STICE et al v. CAMPBELL et al - Page 13
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2004 > STICE et al v. CAMPBELL et al - Page 13
Interference 104,746 Paper 123
Stice v. Campbell
49. The entries in the table are dated from 10 August 1995
through 30 August 1996.
50. Stice's table starts 22 days before Campbell's priority
benefit date of 31 August 1995.
51. Stice's table indicates activity on 10 of the 22 days
before 31 August 1995.
52. The 12 days of inactivity between the start of the
Stice Table and 31 August 1995 comprise four blocks of three days
each.
53. Stice has not offered any explanation of these periods
of silence.
54. Of the 365 days covered by Stice's table following 31
August 1995, 149 are days for which some activity was reported.
and 216 are days without reports of activity.
55. From a calendar marked up to indicated the days of
activity chronicled in Stice's table, it is apparent that there
are several larger blocks of time after Campbell's priority
benefit date during which no activity was reported.
a. The largest block of unexplained inactivity
extends 18 days, from 29 June 1996 through 16 July 1996.
b. The second largest block of unexplained inactivity
covers 16 days, from 4 November 1995 through 19 November 1995.
-13-
Page: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
