Ex Parte Akram - Page 2



            Appeal No. 2005-1894                                                                       
            Application No. 10/209,004                                                                 

            which claims the method for forming the electrode, is                                      
            illustrative:                                                                              
                  2.  A method for forming an electrode comprising:                                    
                        forming an insulating layer;                                                   
                        forming a contact in said insulating layer;                                    
                        forming an electrode layer on said insulating layer and                        
            on said contact;                                                                           
                        etching said electrode layer utilizing a dry etch; and                         
                        etching said electrode layer utilizing a wet etch to                           
            form an electrode having a nodular shape.                                                  
                                           THE REFERENCES                                              
            Sandhu et al.               5,381,302               Jan. 10, 1995                          
                  (Sandhu)                                                                             
            Hosaka2                     62-115767               May  27, 1987                          
                  (Japanese Kokai)                                                                     
                                           THE REJECTION                                               
                  Claims 2 and 4-11 stand rejected as being unpatentable over                          
            Sandhu in view of Hosaka.                                                                  
                                               OPINION                                                 
                  We affirm the aforementioned rejection.                                              
                  The appellant states that the claims stand or fall in three                          
            groups: 1) claims 2, 4-6 and 10; 2) claims 7 and 9; and                                    

                  2 Citations herein to Hosaka are to the English translation thereof                  
            which is of record.                                                                        
                                                  2                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007