The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CEM BASCERI, GURTEJ S. SANDHU and MARK VISOKAY
____________
Appeal No. 2005-2351
Application No. 09/904,112
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10, 15, 22
through 30, 37 through 46, 50, 57 through 63, 74 through 76, and
100 through 105 (Answer, page 2, ¶(3); Reply Brief, page 1).
Claims 11 and 12 stand allowed by the examiner, claims 47 through
49 stand objected to as allowable but depending on a rejected
claim (id.), while the remaining claims pending in this
application stand withdrawn from consideration as directed to a
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007