onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Basceri et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2005 > Ex Parte Basceri et al - Page 1

Sponsored Links



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
               Ex parte CEM BASCERI, GURTEJ S. SANDHU and MARK VISOKAY                
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2005-2351                                  
                             Application No. 09/904,112                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before GARRIS, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
               This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s            
          final rejection of claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10, 15, 22                 
          through 30, 37 through 46, 50, 57 through 63, 74 through 76, and            
          100 through 105 (Answer, page 2, ¶(3); Reply Brief, page 1).                
          Claims 11 and 12 stand allowed by the examiner, claims 47 through           
          49 stand objected to as allowable but depending on a rejected               
          claim (id.), while the remaining claims pending in this                     
          application stand withdrawn from consideration as directed to a             

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007